bloodborne 2

Sony Tweet Sparks Bloodborne 2 Speculations, Gets Deleted

The official Sony Twitter account (not to be confused with the PlayStation handles) made a bit of a blooper last night by publishing a tweet that sparked Bloodborne 2 speculations again. The tweet in question posted a zoomed in photo of a part of Bloodborne’s box art, and casually asked fans “which PlayStation game cover are we zooming in on?” The replies were as crazy as you’d expect – ranging from people expressing their anger over a lack of sequel to fans speculating that an announcement is coming, prompting Sony to realize that it should have known better.

Bloodborne 2 has been a sore point for years

The sequel to FromSoftware’s finest and one of the best PS4 exclusives has been the subject of much debate among the PlayStation community. Many wonder why Sony continues to remaster everything under the sun while neglecting the IP to the point where even a 60 fps upgrade seems out of question. Any rumor we’ve heard about a Bloodborne sequel has been thoroughly debunked and the chances of a new entry certainly seem bleak.

It’s no surprise, then, that the tweet didn’t go down well and Sony’s social media team decided that it was best to just scrub its existence from the internet.

TRENDING
X

Please disable your adblocker and add both PlaystationLifestyle.net and forums.PlaystationLifestyle.net to your allowlist.

It looks like your adblocker is attempting to interfere with the intended operation of this site. Support our writers and our copyrighted content by allowing our site to function as we intended. Please disable your adblocker and add us to your allowlist.

Frequently Asked Questions
I'm not using a blocker. Why am I seeing this message?
You're likely seeing this message because an app or extension on your computer is blocking ads. The app or extension may be a "privacy" or "malware" blocker, or a VPN.

I disabled my blocker. Why am I still seeing this message?
It's common to have two or more adblocking extensions running at the same time. See the question above.